skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Ok, so this is an extreme case. But it has happened! And if you follow the medical logic, you'll believe it has!
The reality...
Once upon a time, there was a lady. She was well in reproductive age. She was in the peak of her menstrual cycle. So, obviously, her already highetened sexual desires overwhelmed her. Now, this lady in question, she was of a liberal mind. She was definitely not a racist.
So, she decided to have sex. And she decided to do it with a man. And she decided to do with a white man. And so, this non-racist liberal woman, she did as she had decided.
Two days passed, her sexual appetite was not satisfied. And thus, she went for another man-hunt. This time, she found a black man who satisfied her.
Before continuing on with the story, let me tell you two points about the lady. Two important and relevant points. One about her nature - she disliked contraceptives. She might have worn/consumed them if she knew what the fate had kept in mind for her, or maybe not. The game of fate we shall see soon.
Second, about her reproductive system. This time, this particular time when she demonstrated that sexual desires are beyond racial barriers, her ovaries played a game with her. But, she was not to know, was she? Normally, one ovary, and only one of the two ovaries, release an ovum (egg) in one menstrual cycle. But this time it was different. This time, both of them decided to contribute in the process.
Now, it so happened, both of the men, the white one and the black one, ejaculated inside her. None of them had used any sort of protection. And, i must re-mention the fate's hand here, the sperms of white man fertilised one ovum and those of the black man fertilised another.
This lady, she got pregnant, and she decided not to undergo an abortion. So she had twins! Twins, indeed! The doctor, in the delivery room, must have had the surprise of his life. It was evident that the twins were unidentical. And how! One of them was black, and the other was white!
And so we see, life, at it's comediest!
Freud hoped to prove that his model was universally valid and thus turned to ancient mythology and contemporary ethnography for comparative material. Freud named his new theory the Oedipus complex after the famous Greek tragedy Oedipus Rex by Sophocles. “I found in myself a constant love for my mother, and jealousy of my father. I now consider this to be a universal event in childhood,” Freud said. Freud sought to anchor this pattern of development in the dynamics of the mind. Each stage is a progression into adult sexual maturity, characterized by a strong ego and the ability to delay gratification (cf. Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality). He used the Oedipus conflict to point out how much he believed that people desire incest and must repress that desire. The Oedipus conflict was described as a state of psychosexual development and awareness. He also turned to anthropological studies of totemism and argued that totemism reflected a ritualized enactment of a tribal Oedipal conflict.
Freud originally posited childhood sexual abuse as a general explanation for the origin of neuroses, but he abandoned this so-called "seduction theory" as insufficiently explanatory, noting that he had found many cases in which apparent memories of childhood sexual abuse were based more on imagination than on real events. During the late 1890s Freud, who never abandoned his belief in the sexual etiology of neuroses, began to emphasize fantasies built around the Oedipus complex as the primary cause of hysteria and other neurotic symptoms. Despite this change in his explanatory model, Freud always recognized that some neurotics had been sexually abused by their fathers, and was quite explicit about discussing several patients whom he knew to have been abused.
Freud also believed that the libido developed in individuals by changing its object, a process codified by the concept of sublimation. He argued that humans are born "polymorphously perverse", meaning that any number of objects could be a source of pleasure. He further argued that, as humans develop, they become fixated on different and specific objects through their stages of development—first in the oral stage (exemplified by an infant's pleasure in nursing), then in the anal stage (exemplified by a toddler's pleasure in evacuating his or her bowels), then in the phallic stage. Freud argued that children then passed through a stage in which they fixated on the mother as a sexual object (known as the Oedipus Complex) but that the child eventually overcame and repressed this desire because of its taboo nature. (The lesser known Electra complex refers to such a fixation on the father.) The repressive or dormant latency stage of psychosexual development preceded the sexually mature genital stage of psychosexual development.
Freud's way of interpretation has been called phallocentric by many contemporary thinkers. This is because, for Freud, the unconscious always desires the phallus (penis). Males are afraid of castration - losing their phallus or masculinity to another male. Females always desire to have a phallus - an unfulfillable desire. Thus boys resent their fathers (fear of castration) and girls desire theirs. For Freud, desire is always defined in the negative term of lack - you always desire what you don't have or what you are not, and it is very unlikely that you will fulfill this desire. Thus his psychoanalysis treatment is meant to teach the patient to cope with his or her unsatisfiable desires.
(oh, by the way, Freud is one of the most brilliant men, his works in psychoanalysis (something like psychology) is greatly recognised!)
My Comments: Pervertism is inherent! So, world, open your mind, and reveal your true nature, people!
